Analisis Stakeholder Dalam Pengembangan	Potensi Wisata Kampung Kemasan Di Kabupaten Gresik

Amanda Putri Kamtono; Anggraeny Puspaningtyas; Supri Hartono

doi:10.30649/psr.v5i1.201

Authors

Amanda Putri Kamtono Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Anggraeny Puspaningtyas Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Supri Hartono Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/psr.v5i1.201

Keywords:

Tourism, Stakeholder, Governance, Gresik regency

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of stakeholders in the development of tourism potential in Kampung Kemasan, Gresik Regency. The development of cultural-based tourism requires the involvement of various stakeholders with different levels of interest and influence; therefore, stakeholder analysis is needed to identify their roles and contributions. This study uses a qualitative approach with data collected through interviews, documentation, and literature review. Stakeholders are classified into four categories: key players, context setters, subjects, and crowd. The results show that stakeholders involved include government institutions, local communities, and supporting groups. The Department of Tourism, Bappeda, and DCKPKP act as key players in planning and implementing tourism programs. Meanwhile, the Department of Transportation, Environmental Agency, Satpol PP, and Diskoperindag function as context setters by supporting policies and infrastructure. Local communities, Pokdarwis, and community groups are categorized as subjects, while others are classified as crowd. Based on visitor data from 2021 to 2025, the number of tourists has increased significantly each year, indicating a positive impact of tourism development. However, coordination among stakeholders still needs improvement. In conclusion, the success of tourism development in Kampung Kemasan is influenced by stakeholder synergy. Strengthening coordination and community empowerment is essential for sustainable tourism management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfahillah, K. (2022). Perancangan Branding Perusahaan Batik Gajah Mungkur Gresik Sebagai Upaya Mengenalkan Produk Budaya Lokal Kepada Masyarakat. https://repository.dinamika.ac.id/id/eprint/6290/

Dasar, U., Republik, N., & Tahun, I. (2025). pemberdayaan masyarakat, kelestarian lingkungan hidup, aspek peningkatan ekonomi, dan keterpaduan. 271079.

Disparekrafbudpora Kab. Gresik. (2021). Renstra Disparekrafbudpora Kab. Gresik 2021-2026.

Ilmu, S., Negara, A., Ilmu, F., Surabaya, U. N., Ilmu, S., Negara, A., Ilmu, F., & Surabaya, U. N. (2020). STRATEGI PROMOSI WISATA HERITAGE DI KABUPATEN GRESIK. 435–450.

Maharani, N. M. B. C. (2025). Strategi Dinas Pariwisata Dalam Pengembangan Wisata Budaya Melalui Program Denpasar Heritage City Tour di Kota Denpasar. Socio-Political Communication and Policy Review, 2(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.61292/shkr.231

Noviyanti, U. D. E., & Serinanda, A. R. (2022). Peran Kelompok Sadar Wisata Sidokumpul Kompak Berhias (SIKOBER) Dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata di Kampung Kreasi Kabupaten Gresik. Jurnal Kajian Pariwisata Dan Bisnis Perhotelan, 3(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.24036/jkpbp.v3i1.48072

Nur Wachid, Z. A., & Rahmatin, L. S. (2024). Analisis Kolaborasi Stakeholder Dalam Pengelolaan Daya Tarik Wisata Makam Sunan Giri Gresik. Journal Publicuho, 7(4), 2368–2378. https://doi.org/10.35817/publicuho.v7i4.609

Rosyadi, K., Rozikin, M., & Trisnawati. (2020). LISIS PENGELOLAAN DAN PELESTARIAN CAGAR BUDAYA SEBAGAI WUJUD PENYELENGGARAAN URUSAN WAJIB PEMERINTAHAN DAERAH (Studi pada

Pengelolaan dan Pelestarian Situs Majapahit Kecamatan Trowulan Kabupaten Mojokerto). Jurnal Administrasi Publik (JAP), 2(5), 830–836.

Siregar, J. P., Sari, K. E., & Mariami, I. (2022). Representasi dari Faktor-Faktor Pembentuk Identitas Tempat pada Kampung Kemasan, Gresik. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Kota, 18(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.14710/pwk.v18i1.35881

Tseng, M. L., Tan, P. A., Jeng, S. Y., Lin, C. W. R., Negash, Y. T., & Darsono, S. N. A. C. (2019). Sustainable investment: Interrelated among corporate governance, economic performance and market risks using investor preference approach. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(7), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072108