Demokrasi Indonesia Masa Kepemimpinan Presiden Jokowi-Amin Periode 2019-2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30649/psr.v2i2.111Keywords:
Demokrasi, Kepemimpinan, IndonesiaAbstract
Launch of 2020 Indonesian Ombudsman Annual Report on Monday 8 February 2021, President Joko Widodo said "public be active in conveying criticism, input, or potential maladministration.” Public service providers continue to increase efforts improvements. On the other hand, President's statement is very contradictory or contrary to socio-political and democratic developments society occurred Jokowi became President of Indonesia for 2nd period in 2019-2024. Several socio-political events that occurred showed democratic process in Indonesia experienced shift or decreased percentage. This paper describes and analyzes development of Indonesian democracy during leadership of President Joko Widodo Period II and factors decline development of democracy in Indonesia. This paper uses reference studies and documentation data collection techniques, sources, and uses a qualitative descriptive analysis of development democracy in Indonesia during President Jokowi's second period. The results of study found and according to Compas research until October 7 2022, that a decline development of democracy in Indonesia, decrease in public trust in performance of Jokowi-Amin Government field of law enforcement, only at 51.5%. Achievement is down compared to the results of previous survey in June 2022. The economic sector is only 50.8% to rising prices of basic commodities which continue increase. Eventhough, social welfare sector is still 74% is possibility to be temporary, because BLT has been disbursed community, political and security sector 74.6%, increasing lack of response or (bored) public response socio-political situation dominated by political party activities 2024 election.
Downloads
References
Aini, D., Farhaini, A., & Putra, B. K. (2023). Community Participation in Improving Health in Remote Areas: A Literature Review. International Journal of Education, Information Technology and Others (IJEIT), 6(2), 27–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7798056
Alfitri, R. (2009). Demokrasi Indonesia: Mewujudkan Kesejahteraan atau Melahirkan Kesenjangan. Jurnal PPKn Dan Hukum, 4(1).
Almond, A., Gabriel, A., & Sidney, V. (1963). The Civic Culture Princeton. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Amiin, A. R. (2021). Siapa Mau Jadi Tumbal? Jawa Pos.
Arend, L. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in TwentyOne Countries. New Heaven Conn: Yale University Press.
Christmann, P. (2018). Economic Performance, Quality of Democracy and Satisfaction with Democracy. Electoral Studies, 53, 79–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2018.04.0 04
Correa-Lopera, G. (2019). Demand of Direct Democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 60(May). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.08.00 4
Elbahnasawy, N. G. (2020). Democracy, Political Instability, and Government Tax Effort in Hydrocarbon-Dependent Countries. Resources Policy, 65(11), 101–530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.1015 30
Farhaini, A., Putra, B. K., & Aini, D. (2022). Reformasi Birokrasi dalam Pelayanan Publik Melalui Aplikasi Halodoc di Kota Mataram. Professional: Jurnal Komunikasi Dan Administrasi Publik, 9(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37676/professional.v9i1.2416
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The End of History and The Last Man. New York: Free Press.
Gallier, C. (2020). Democracy and Compliance in Public Goods Games. European Economic Review, 121, 103–346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.10 3346
Ghia, N. (1994). “Nationalism and Democracy”, dalam Larry Diamond and Marc F. Plattner (ed) Nationalism, Ethinic Conflict, and Democracy. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ignas, K. (1998). Budaya Politik atau Moralitas Politik? Kompas.
John, P., & Sjoberg, F. M. (2020). Partisan Responses to Democracy Promotion-Estimating the Causal Effect of a Civic Information Portal. World Development, 130, 104–914. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.1049 14
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2014). Practical research planning and design. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
Mas’oed, M. (2002). Peran Civil Society Sebagai Mitra Kerja Pemerintah dan Dunia Usaha dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance. Jogjakarta: PKPEK Dan Forkoma MAP-UGM.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Putra, B. K. (2022). Kontribusi Negara dan Masyarakat dalam Proses Demokratisasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Publika, 10(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/publika.v10i1.7091
Putra, B. K., Dewi, R. M., Fadilah, Y. H., & Roziqin, A. (2021). REFORMASI BIROKRASI DALAM PELAYANAN PUBLIK MELALUI MOBILE JKN DI KOTA MALANG. Jurnal Ilmiah Publika, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/publika.v9i1.5325
Putra, B. K., & Dhanuarta, C. B. (2021). Transformation of Public Services Through Electronic-Based Government System in Malang City. International Journal of Education, Information Technology and Others (IJEIT), 4(3), 452–459. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5205295
Putra, B. K., & Hadi, K. (2022). State and Community Participation in the Democratization Process in Indonesia. International Journal of Education, Information Technology, and Others (IJEIT), 5(5), 28–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7414335
Putra, B. K., & Hijri, Y. S. (2022). Participation of the State and Civil Society in the Democracy System in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(24), 235–247. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7486365
Putra, B. K., & Salahudin, S. (2022). Analysis of Challenges and Potential of the Village Economy Towards Competitive Village Development. Publik (Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi), 11(1), 45–61. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31314/pjia.11.1.45-60.2022
Putra, B. K., & Sihidi, I. T. (2022). Keterlibatan Negara dan Masyarakat Sipil Dalam Proses Menuju Demokratisasi di Indonesia. Hukum Responsif, 13(2), 69–80. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.33603/responsif.v13i2.7360
Rahmatulloh, R. (2013). Wajah Demokrasi Jakarta Dalam Potret Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia (IDI). Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324. 004
Sa’adawisna, D., & Putra, B. K. (2022). The Effect of the Establishment of a New Autonomous Region on Electoral District Regulations in the 2024 General Election. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(20), 484–493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7269113
Sa’adawisna, D., & Putra, B. K. (2023). POLITICAL EDUCATION TO INCREASE BEGINNER VOTER PARTICIPATION IN THE 2019 GENERAL ELECTIONS. Awang Long Law Review, 5(2), 419–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v5i2.716
Sager, F. (2018). Policy Evaluation and Democracy: Do they Fit? Evaluation and Program Planning, 69, 125–129. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.0 8.004
Sandy, T. R. (2018). Menurunnya Kebebasan Berserikat dan Berkumpul Pada Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia (IDI). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/http://digilib.unila.ac.id/33222 /
Schwandt, T. A. (2015). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Serek, J., & Lomicova, L. (2020). Adolescents Transitions Between Different Views on Democracy: Examining Individuallevel Moderators. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 66(March), 101–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.10110 4
Sorensen, G. (1993). Democracy and Democratization, Process, and Prospect in a Changing World. Oxford: Westview Press Inc.
Stepan, A. (1978). State and Society: Peru in Corporative Perspective. New Jersey: Princenton University Press.
Stutzer, A., Baltensperger, M., & Meier, A. N. (2019). Overstrained Citizens? The Number of Ballot Propositions and The Quality of The Decision Process in Direct Democracy. European Journal of Political Economy, 59(5), 483–500. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.05.00 8
Wahidah, N., Isro’ullaili, I., & Putra, B. K. (2023). The School Literacy Movement (GLS) and Student’s Interest in Reading at SDN 3 Suka Makmur. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 9(7), 559–564. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7826963
Zaini, M. (2019). Kebijakan Pemberlakuan Politik Demokrasi dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kesejahteraan Sosial. Paradigma: Jurnal Filsafat, Sains, Teknologi, Dan Sosial Budaya, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33503/paradigma.v25i1.48 4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Public Sphere Review

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







